-
Free 30-Days Return & Refund (or Exchange)
Sparkle Intel Arc A770 Titan OC Edition, 16GB GDDR6, ThermalSync, Torn Cooling, Axial Fan, Metal Backplate, SA770T-16GOC Electronics
Rated 4.83 out of 5 based on 18 customer ratings
(19 customer reviews)
SKU:
B0CCDX6G1F
Graphics Coprocessor Intel Arc A770
Brand Sparkle Computer
Graphics Ram Size 16 GB
GPU Clock Speed 2300 MHz
Video Output Interface DisplayPort, HDMI
$319.99
33
People watching this product now!
Payment Methods:

Description
- Intel Arc A770 Chipset
- 16GB, 256-bit, GDDR6 memory, 17.5 Gbps graphics memory speed
- 3x DisplayPort 2.0 ready, up to 8K@60Hz, 1x HDMI 2.0
- Xe HPG Architecture, Real Time Ray Tracing, Intel XeSS upscaling, 225W TDP, DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.3
- TORN Cooling with triple customized AXL fans, 2.5-slot design, full-metal backplate and patented(pending) ThermalSync
Customer Reviews
4.8
Rated 4.8 out of 5
19 reviews
Rated 5 out of 5
15
Rated 4 out of 5
3
Rated 3 out of 5
0
Rated 2 out of 5
0
Rated 1 out of 5
0
19 reviews for Sparkle Intel Arc A770 Titan OC Edition, 16GB GDDR6, ThermalSync, Torn Cooling, Axial Fan, Metal Backplate, SA770T-16GOC Electronics
Clear filters
Add a review Cancel reply
Related Products
Playseat Trophy Sim Racing Cockpit | High Performance Racing Simulator Cockpit | Supports Direct Drive | Compatible with all Steering Wheels & Pedals on the Market | Supports PC & Console | Black Everything Else
Rated 5.00 out of 5
In stock
$584.79
SKU:
B09XQC9RK8
ARES WING Racing Simulator Cockpit with Monitor Mount and Seat, Formula and GT Sim Racing Cockpit Compatible with Fanatec, Thrustmaster, Logitech, Moza Racing Games on PS5, PS4, Xbox and PC Video Games
Rated 4.60 out of 5
In stock
$343.39
SKU:
B0DM5L7M4Q
DIWANGUS Racing Simulator Cockpit Foldable Racing Wheel Stand with Seat Racing Chair Sim Racing for Logitech G29 G920 G923 G27 G25 Thrustmaster T248X T248 T300RS T150 458 TX Xbox PS4 PS5 Accessories Video Games
Rated 4.50 out of 5
In stock
$201.99
SKU:
B0CQN3W8GN
Model Name |
T220301 |
---|---|
Button Quantity |
1 |
Additional Features |
1 |
Power Source |
Corded Electric |
Hardware Platform |
Xbox One |
Controller Type |
Steering Wheel |
Connectivity Technology |
1 |
Compatible Devices |
1 |
Item Dimensions |
55 x 20 x 38 inches |
Item Dimensions D x W x H |
55"D x 20"W x 38"H |
Package Quantity |
1 |
Item Weight |
30 Pounds |
Color |
Black |
Dardoo G29 Racing Simulator Cockpit with Seat Compatible with Thrustmaster/Logitech/Fanatec/PC G25 G27 G920 G923 T300RS,Ultra-Sturdy Alloy Steel Steering Wheel Stand,Without Wheel,Pedal & Handbrake Video Games
Rated 4.43 out of 5
In stock
$300.26
SKU:
B0BTLHMWF7
Seat Depth |
32.68 inches |
---|---|
Item Weight |
77.3 Pounds |
Item Dimensions D x W x H |
48.5"D x 24.7"W x 38.5"H |
Model Number |
NO.54-RED |
Model Name |
NO.54-RED |
Brand Name |
Dardoo |
Special Features |
Leather seat, Round Tube Structure (50mm), Flange Structure |
Item Shape |
Round |
Color |
Sim Cockpit 54+redseat |
Material Type |
Alloy Steel |
Marada Aluminum Profile Racing Simulator Cockpit with Seat, Unlimited Adjustment, Suitable for Thrustmaster/Fanatec/Moza/Logitech G29 G920 G Pro Racing Frame, Not include SteeringWheel.Pedals,Handbrake. Video Games
Rated 4.90 out of 5
In stock
$595.89
SKU:
B0CFQ28B64
Model Name |
sim cockpit-80 |
---|---|
Additional Features |
The racing cockpit is made of stable aluminum profiles, which are more durable, Racing cockpit steering wheel cockpit, The sliding track design of the steering wheel stand provides a more aesthetically pleasing appearance, Black ergonomic racing simulator seats are breathable and non collapsing, The sim racing cockpit can be infinitely adjusted |
Power Source |
No |
Hardware Platform |
PlayStation, Xbox, PC/Mac/Linux/Unix |
Controller Type |
External gaming device |
Connectivity Technology |
Manual |
Compatible Devices |
Logitech Fanatec Thrustmaster |
Item Dimensions |
31.5 x 25.9 x 7.1 inches |
Package Quantity |
1 |
Color |
BLACK SEAT+RACING SIMULATOR COCKPIT |
Zachary K.Zachary K. –
Not sure if the design was changed on the ECO, based on other reviews it seemed that it was hard to swap the bracket to the low profile one. There is a small access hole to unscrew it now instead of taking off the shroud. Just 3 screws, the hidden one, the exposed one, and the one on the HDMI port is all that is needed.
EthanEthan –
Intel Arc is improving. AND I looked at AMD and Nvidia Graphics cards and they are expensive (of course). I decided to give the Intel Arc a try. It was cheaper than most but it was an insane 16 GB of VRAM and 256 bit. WoW. It was easy to install using my Asrock B760M Pro RS Wifi white and paired with an i5-12600kf it is speedy fast and is swiftly competitive. The included stand that Sparkle gives you is useful with studiness so the GPU does not sag overtime. And it is rock solid sturdy!Of course with Intel Arc new, the stability is good hut not perfect, usually sometimes when pushing to its max it’s kinda unstable but seems normal but under land should be fine. The screen color displaying this graphics is good.Overall, if you are thinking about Intel Arc Graphics without breaking the bank. Then, this card is for you. Remember, you are doing some benefits but with risks. Intel Arc is improving as time goes on. And it will be better.
DblDbl –
Really glad I went with this graphics card over AMD or NVIDIA. This was for an all Intel micro build. I work in graphic arts, Blender and some gaming, so the Arc card fit my needs. I’ve always been an Intel girl as it’s always been reliable in my line of work. I was a tad skeptical at first due to reviews on issues with drivers. However, I have not personally encountered any issues thus far with the programs/games I run. I love how the LED strip on the side gives you a rough idea on how warm the card is running. Another plus would be the little support piece/crutch the card comes with. Sure, it makes the build look a little less “clean”, but I’d rather have a stable card than a wobbly one.The biggest downside I have encountered is the fan noise. Out of the box, the fans sit at a default of 30% fan speed. Because of this, they continually ramp up and down, starting and stopping. This can be very annoying. From what I understand, this is an issue with Intel Sparkle cards in general, not a user error and it does not matter how up-to-date your drivers are (as of writing this review). However, I personally found using the Intel ArcControl app, going under Performance, and turning the Fan Speed Control to “Fixed Fan Speed” has made a big difference. I set my fan speeds to roughly 35% and this helps in keeping them consistently spinning, while still being fairly quiet.Having sound on while gaming, waring headphones, or having the computer in a different location will also cut the fan noise in sure. I like to monitor my hardware visually and audibly, thus my PC is oriented on my desk in such a way where I can’t ignore the noise completely. If you are looking for a completely silent graphics card, this is definitely not the one for you. In some games, there was a noticeable coil whine when turning the graphics settings up to Ultra. Of course this can be remedied by lowing frame rate and graphics settings in general, but I have also noted this sound has decrease over the past few months after some use.Definitely worth the buy in my opinion!
GNINSC –
This isn’t really a great gaming card, but if you want to use it for transcoding (either on the fly or for media storage), its absolutely amazing.I can encode x265 video at between 450 and 800 fps and the output quality is better than Nvidia, AMD, or even the software encoders. I’ve also got it setup to transcode on the fly for my Jellyfin install when needed.I did opt for the larger version that still take up 2 slots – the smaller single slot one is just as powerful but the tiny blower fan on it is loud if you look at some other reviews. This version with the larger heatsink and larger fan is quiet at all times.If you’re looking to game look elsewhere (even amongst Intel ARC cards you’re better off with a 750 or 770, but they all have the same transcoding engine so for that purpose the 310 is great.
LizLiz –
The A770 TITAN OC Edition boasts a beautiful design and excellent build quality. Its triple-fan cooling system ensures efficient thermal performance, making it an attractive addition to any gaming rig.Performance:For 1080p gaming, the A770 holds its ground. It’s a decent performer across a broad range of titles, both older and newer.Where the A770 truly shines is at 1440p. If you’re pushing higher resolutions or playing VRAM-intensive titles with high to ultra settings, this GPU delivers great results. Whether you’re gaming with or without ray-tracing, the A770 TITAN OC Edition holds its own. Pros:- Beautiful Design: The A770 features an eye-catching design.- Premium Build Quality: Sturdy construction with excellent thermal management.- Generous VRAM: 16GB of VRAM for future-proofing.- Solid 1080p and 1440p Performance: Ideal for most gamers.- 256 bit memory bus- 3x DisplayPort 2.0- 1x HDMI 2.0bCons:- Performance and Driver Issues:While Intel’s drivers have dramatically improved (I cannot stress this enough DRAMATICALLY since launch), there’s still room for stability enhancements.- Competition from Other GPUs: The GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 7600 provide stiff if lackluster competition.Final ThoughtsThe SPARKLE Intel Arc A770 TITAN OC Edition is a compelling choice for gamers seeking a mainstream GPU with ample VRAM. I bought this expecting for it to struggle with the games I play, but surprisingly that has not been my experience. I’m glad to report that I’ve had ZERO issues. I do have it paired with an Intel i7 12700k CPU which takes advantage of Intels’ Deep Link technology which boosts the performance of this GPU.In summary, the A770 TITAN OC Edition offers great value, especially for those aiming at 1440p gaming.This is a sturdy and robust piece of hardware. Its performance is truly remarkable. I recommend grabbing one while they’re still available!I am very happy with this purchase!Happy gaming!
Rob Allshouse –
No question nVidia owns the market, but at certain price points, the options are to go old and miss out on modern video formats, and generally consume two slots and a lot of power. Given the use case I was going for, immich ml and Jellyfin transcoding in an old server, the small size, small power consumption, and modern drivers fit my need.Power consumption transcoding a 4k HEVC movie takes the 13W idle to 21W active. No power connections were needed. Container inclusion was a simple two lines in my Docker compose.I did have to upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04 (even though Intel’s website said 22.04 was supported). But for less that $100 (for the A310), I now can hardware transcode any ‘difficult’ movie, and transcode multiple streams simultaneously. And it fits in my old server without challenges.
Juan Carlos Herrera Blandon –
Me encantó mucho la calidad, que tiene la tarjeta, funciona excelente, tiene gran compatibilidad
John H –
to get to 240 hz you need a nVidia 4080, or amd 7900xtx [ or higher ]
Anonymous –
I originally purchased an Intel A770 16GB LE back in March 2023 as part of my new build, but after a few months of escalating issues and then weeks of troubleshooting it was determined to be defective. I had to accept a refund because Intel stopped making the A770 16GB LE available for consumers.While looking for another card, I stumbled upon Sparkle’s AIB for the A770 16GB LE. A friend of mine knew a bit about Sparkle from the past and after talking to them about the company, I decided to give Sparkle a try. I was also curious if all of the issues I was experiencing were really because of a defective GPU and not due to awful drivers. But I couldn’t get my hands on the same card as before because I wasn’t willing to pay over $400 USD for it; this was my next best bet.The new card by Sparkle worked great. All of my issues from before (artifacting, crashes that lead to BSOD’s) vanished, even when I used the same drivers as before. But as I was using the card, I noticed the GPU was running hot and got to around 89-90°C in FurMark, using default settings and the 1440 preset, and while playing Baldur’s Gate 3 on max settings and 2560×1440 resolution. After talking to a friend because I was concerned about this, I was asked to rotate the case onto its back, and it was determined these temperatures were because of my case and how GPU manufacturers design the cooling for their cards. I use an Alta F1 by Silverstone, which is a 90° case. This seats the card in a vertical orientation versus the more common horizontal orientation of most other cases. By rotating my case onto its back, this orientated the card horizontally, and I was able to verify this. Temperatures during identical testing came in at 63-66°C while using GPU-Z and Intel Arc Controller’s overlay.I contacted Sparkle, but didn’t have my hopes up. This was apparently a well documented issue (granted I never knew about it before this happened to me because this was my first time using a 90° case in a build) that has been ignored by other GPU manufacturers because 90° cases are considered a niche market, so why go through the effort of making changes for them. But Sparkle reached out to me with one of their engineers and we shared information and troubleshooting data. They even went so far as to buy the same case I have, which cost more than the GPU, to verify the issue on their end. They said they would work on a resolution and get back to me.A couple of months later and near the end of December, they let me know they resolved the issue and wanted to send me the new, modified card. They paid for all of the shipping. They shipped it directly from Taiwan, while I simultaneously shipped them my old card. I received it on January 2nd of 2024 and got an email the next day from the engineer I was in contact with asking me how it was performing. Benchmarks in FurMark, using default settings and the 1440 preset, had the card running at 83°C. In Baldur’s Gate 3, I had temperatures of 71-76°C while on max video settings and in 2560×1440 resolution; all of which while the card was in a vertical orientation.Not only did Sparkle fix the problem as best as they could, but they took the entire issue seriously from start to finish. They never made any excuses, they just wanted to work with me and fix it. It was an absolute pleasure dealing with the people at Sparkle and they earned themselves a loyal customer as a result of how well they handled this. I’m excited to see what you do with the Battlemage, and other generations, when they come out.
tony r. –
Ok i know this sounds like an exaggeration but this is the god to honest truth, i bought the sparkle a770 o.c. 16gb edition specifically for converting 2d 4k video into 4k 3d full sbs video. I own an rtx 3070 by nvidia and an rtx 3090. And when it comes to video editing in davinci resolve, the arc a770 by sparkles not only is blazing fast but it absolutely murders the rtx 3070 at rendering 4k in davinci resolve. When i used to deflicker a 4k 3d depth map with my rtx 3070, it would take 17 hours to run a deflicker filter on my 3d depth maps. Well on the arc a770, it takes me only 4 hours and 49 minutes.My rtx 3090 would take 5 and a half hours to deflicker a depth map in davinci. So the arc is 30 minutes faster at deflickering a two hour 3d depth map video than my rtx 3090. I don’t know what intel has done but their drivers have vastly improved for video rendering. Now when i want to combine a depth map with a 2d video to make a 3d video, my rrx 3090 would take 26 to 30 hours to render a 4k 3d two hour video. With my arc a770 by sparkle it takes only 18 hours. So in that specific task it is 8 to 12 hours faster at rendering a 4k 3d video. This puts it on par with a 4080 for video rendering specifically when it comes to editing 3d video in a software called 3d combine. Im so impressed im gonna sell my 3090 , because why would i keep my 3090 when it cost more and my arc is faster. Now im a video editor so i can only speak for video editing, that this card is better at video editing in some instances of 4k than an nvidia card, but i can’t speak about the gaming aspect because i did not buy this card to game, i did hear that this card is slower at gaming, but if you are a content creator, and u dont game, this is a better card, it has improved my conversion times at lot on video renders, the reviews on YouTube are outdated and all the reviews are mainly about gaming, so im speaking from the standpoint of people who are looking for a card for video editing and rendering, this is the card to go to.
0x –
I use this in my Jellyfin and *arr homelab setup to transcode media on the fly. I also use it with Tdarr to transcode H264 to H265. It can do three 4K streams at 300-400 fps simultaneously no sweat. The best part is that since its only 50W TBP, it draws all the power it needs from the PCIe slot and doesn’t need additional power cables. I would not recommend this GPU for gaming, but it’s obviously not meant for that.
Heath Herpin –
I bought this to go into my home media server – a Linux server. It uses 2008-era hardware except for the storage drives. I run PLEX on it and wanted something for hardware transcoding to take the pressure off of the CPU. This little, power-efficient card does that in spades.The SystemCPU: Intel Xeon E5450 (LGA-771 modded to fit into an LGA-775 socket)Motherboard: SuperMicro ATX LGA-771 P45RAM: 8GB DDR2-800 (max the MB would support)Boot drive: Intel 120GB SATA SSD (limited to SATA2 speeds)Storage Drive 1: 3TB Western Digital Green HDD (Share Drive)Storage Drive 2: 8TB Western Digital Red HDD (Plex media drive)It runs Ubuntu Server 24.04 in Console Mode only, so it idles only around 350MB of memory used. The CPU is a Xeon quad-core at 3GHz. During any kind of transcoding, the CPU usage would shoot up to over 90%. I wanted something that could do the job while only sipping power, not gobbling it up.I finally pulled the trigger on this graphics card and installed it into the system. I had to also install MESA 2 and upgrade my Kernel to 6.0 or higher, but it worked. Transcoding happens and my CPU remains at idle.AND it has support for the lastest video codec: AV1. THAT is amazing. I am very impressed with this card for this use case. And this is on a system that doesn’t have REBAR or whatever that setting is. It’s 2008 old LGA-775 (think Core 2 Duo/Quad times) hardware. Anyone else wanting something like this – you can’t go wrong with this card.
Nunya BiznessNunya Bizness –
My older computer’s graphics card broke and I needed it replaced. I wanted the most bang for my money and specs wise, this is it.Pros:This gpu has plenty of power and potential to unlock with better drivers. It has plenty of vram which makes it somewhat future proof. The gpu is not that loud when the fans are on full speed. It rarely does. The performance of the gpu is a mixed bag. When the gpu plays a game with a well optimized drivers, it runs it flawlessly. Super smooth and unbelievable to the eyes. One such title is Ratchet and Clank. I couldn’t believe that it performed that well. I turned on ray tracing and all I can say is wow. I cannot praise Intel enough for their effort into their gpus and their drivers. Bravo is all I can say.Cons:The biggest con I experienced is that it wouldn’t work on my computer. I have a 9th generation Intel and I couldn’t get it to work. Now before you all come down on me, I know that a 10th gen is highly recommended by Intel. I researched and there have been people who were able to get the gpu to work on a 9th and even 8th gen cpu so long as resizable bar was enabled. RB was enabled on my motherboard. I could not get it to work. Maybe it just didn’t like my cpu and motherboard combination. I did install the gpu on my 12th gen gaming machine and it worked great. My biggest gripe with the gpu is the micro stuttering I experience while playing many games. It isn’t smooth at all especially if you experienced a high end Nvidia gpu with g-sync.Conclusion:I really wanted to keep this gpu. I really do. If it worked with my 9th gen computer, I would be willing to hang with Intel and wait as they smooth things out on their end. But I don’t have a choice because my older pc needs a gpu and this just wouldn’t work. That’s just too bad. We so need to have a 3rd competitor in the gpu world to help control prices. But since it just wouldn’t work on my device I couldn’t keep it. I’m not willing to buy a new cpu, motherboard just so I can use this.If your cpu and motherboard works with this gpu, go for it. Intel is really putting their heart and soul into ARC and any support they can get from consumers will just allow them to continue that. I really really hate to do this but this is going back since it doesn’t work for my needs.
Eric DiDomenicoEric DiDomenico –
Eleven months into using my ASRock PG Arc A770 16GB card, it had a break down. Thankfully, ASRock had me ship it to them to see if it can be saved. So while I await news, I purchased the Sparkle Arc A770 Roc Edition. After using it for nearly two weeks of steady use, the Roc Edition version proves it can go head to head with ASRock’s Phantom Gaming Arc card. After putting the Roc through multiple benchmarks, it came back to be tit for tat in nearly every single benchmark result. Performance, temps, you name it. The only part where it falls short is fan noise. But that is to be expected as it is a two fan card compared to Sparkle’s Titan A770 or ASRock’s PG cards (both of them are triple fan cards). Power consumption is pretty much the same across the board. In almost every thing is the Roc tied with the PG.I almost went with the Titan but I’ve heard a few nightmare stories about hardware failure, so I chose the Roc. In the end, I’m happy with this card.
CAPN –
Performance-wise, it handles more than you’d think. 1440p gaming is smooth, and it doesn’t choke on newer titles as long as you’re not cranking settings to “let’s fry the card” levels. For what it is, it punches above its weight class.The OC edition gives it a bit more juice, which is nice, but let’s be real, the real win here is the price. Intel GPUs are in this sweet spot where they’re not overpriced for what they can do, unlike some of the more bloated offerings from the big two. It’s like they know they’re not winning the race, so they’re pricing themselves just right to stay in the game.Cooling and build quality are solid too. It doesn’t sound like a jet engine under load, and it doesn’t feel like it’ll fall apart if you look at it wrong. Sparkle did a decent job making it feel premium without the premium price tag.Final thoughts: If you’re looking for a GPU that’s surprisingly capable and doesn’t obliterate your wallet, this one’s worth a look.
RenDracoRenDraco –
A very sturdy and tough graphics cardPros:I didn’t expect less from a electronics builder as Sparkle, despite its absence in the graphics cards niche. in fact, this is a company who build nice things.A G.c. well built, with a nice size, not oversized or too compact, with enough heatsink to keep the beast cool under 40.c in a room over 32.c with no fan noise.In rendering or gaming, with all the power that she wants to engulf, don’t come over 70 c. maybe I have to work or gaming harder with this.A very silent G.c. . the fans on the card, don’t exceed the 1300 rpm. this is just logic, related to kind of usage and room temperature, (25c. when is cold, 34.c when is hot) this at normal video playing and working, photo editing and, graphics design, average office work. etc… is just imperceptible and very stable.the industrial design of the graphics card are flawless.straight lines, nice “intel blue” color, not overloaded with unnecessary “rgb” like an “spielberg ufo”, a nice trio of well built fans, and a useful light that indicates the temperature in real time, besides being aesthetic.I think that this G.c. is one of a kind, and Intel is right now, despite the critics or weaning and moaning from of millennials users, making a very nice job, as usual withIntel products, a nice engineering, and is noted that intel and its software team are working hard to support this line of product and make it grow, powerful and stable.the cost-benefit ratio is unbeatable.In my whole pc career, using Pcs daily, is very nice to see a third fighter in this arena, offering a very wide variety of products and prices, according to the most of peoples budgets and needs, not only bloating with merchandising and overdosing Rgb lights, selling to you things that you don’t need at all at ridiculous pricescons: none at this very moment.If you want to buy one of this G.c. you have to know, this is not a product for an average puberty boy or teenager who wants just “lights and numbers”….”look mine is better because I get 10k fps”. “more Rgb for more fps” kind of user.despite this, you will get nice numbers if that’s only worrying you about. you only need to know, some games are optimized for some G. cards than others, and this is the world we living right now.in any case, “choose wisely which game to play in your card, or just buy a G.c. for play your game”.also, if you’ re more a creator or I.t. worker than a gamer, like me, this Arc G.C. line up is for you.I hope that this will be useful to you.Grettings
AG –
I bought it out of curiosity, I watched several youtube videos, reddit blogs, looking for information and the opinions were mixed, but after a few weeks of testing it out with different games (old and new) I can 100% say that it is a great graphics card, it handles the majority of games on ultra settings, no bugs or errors have show up. I hope more people buy this card to put some pressure on AMD and Nvidia. My PC has a Ryzen 5 5600X processor, 32GB of ram at 3200Mhz, 2TB SSD and a 750W PSU if you guys need a reference. This card actually draws quite a bit of power, so it is necessary to have a 650W PSU or higher to avoid problems. Also make sure your motherboard has resizable bar as this is a must for the graphics card.
Brandon CBrandon C –
I upgraded from an AMD Radeon RX570 4gb to this Sparkle Orc ARC A750 because it was time. The RX570 was getting a little long in the tooth. I used DDU to uninstall the AMD display drivers and shut the computer down. After removing the old GPU, I installed the A750 and was pleasantly surprised on how much more room I had (the A750 is smaller than the RX570). The A750 looked great after installation. One thing I made sure to do was use separate VGA cables for the two 8 pin power connectors the A750 needs instead of using just one like I did on the AMD card. Intel claims you need a power supply with a minimum of 650 watts, however, all PSU power calculators online that I tried said 500 is sufficient. This is good because my power supply is only rated at 600 watts so I may need to upgrade that in the coming future.Driver install went without a hitch. I like the Intel control center and its layout. It’s easy to read and navigate. Of course I had to check out the performance configuration page and check out the over clocking, even though I don’t over clock.I don’t game much, maybe three games is all I ever play. I fired up WoW and on max settings at 1440p I got 125 FPS. Yes, I know, WoW can play on a potato, but it was still interesting to see the performance difference compared to my RX570 which could only achieve 45 FPS on the same settings.The next game I tried was EverQuest 2, and yes once again this game can play on a potato. At max settings 1440p I got 138 FPS. The AMD card could only get 55.The last game I tried was Eve Online. I got 80 FPS on 1080p at medium settings with my RX570. With the A750 I got 123 FPS at 1440p maxed out settings and FSR set to max qualityI should mention that the A750 never got above 65 degrees Celsius while gaming, and that’s with automatic fan curve enabled.The only real con I could find was at idle in Windows 11 desktop, the card consumed 45 watts. This seemed a bit excessive to me, but hey what do I know?I also wanted to mention that the Sparkle logo lights up and changes color depending on the CPU temperature. When in windows or watching videos the logo lit up blue. While playing games, it lit up yellow. I assume the next colors are orange and red if the CPU gets hotter, but I haven’t seen those yet.I know Intel has come a long way with driver optimization and still has more work to do with some games out there. As for now, everything is working just fine for me.The price to performance ratio simply cannot be beat. Nvidia and AMD should take note. You shouldn’t need to refinance your house just to purchase a great video card for your rig.In conclusion, if you’ve been on the fence about joining team blue, now’s the time. I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised, I know I was. My rig specs are below.AMD Ryzen 5 5600xAsus ROG Strix B550 F WiFi II32gb G.Skill Trident Z 3600mhz RGB1TB Klevv m.2 nvme gen 4Sparkle Orc Intel ARC A750 OC
scifidude79 –
I decided to try Intel graphics after watching some videos on the Arc cards. Prior to that, my experiences with Intel graphics weren’t good, from the old chipsets built into Intel motherboards to the newer UHD graphics built into Intel processors. But, I still decided to give Arc a try and I’m glad I did.I bought this card specifically for the overclocking. The sale page says it goes up to 2200 MHz, but according to the Intel Arc control panel, it mostly runs at 2400 MHz. This likely offers a boost over the Intel branded card, and they’re the same price. Plus, I got mine for $30 off, making it an even better deal. The performance in games ranges from good to excellent, depending on the game. Some games like Cyberpunk 2077, RoboCop: Rogue City and Gotham Knights really love Intel Arc graphics and have settings specifically for these cards. A lot of other games just run great, but a few older games require some tweaks to make them run. I have to use dxvk-async for Arkham Knight and I have to set my Steam launch options with my VRAM amount for GTAIV, but those are minor things. Once I fixed those minor issues, both games run just fine. So, experiences can vary based on the game, but that’s true of any graphics card. I find this to mostly just be a great card for gaming in general. Plus, Intel seems to release new drivers around the end of each month, which is a great schedule and the drivers keep making the cards better.The only minor issue I have with this card is that the fans do spin up kind of loud when it’s under full load, but the card doesn’t overheat. The most I’ve been able to push it to is about 80c, and that was with Cyberpunk and Starfield running at high settings. But, 80c isn’t bad at all. Sure, the fans were pretty loud at that point, but they were doing their job.So, all said and done, I’m really pleased with this card and I recommend this to anyone looking for a good budget option, provided you don’t mind doing some tweaking for some games.